k2trav wrote:Heard they switched up towers 12 and 22
cccski wrote:K2Trav, can you explain "heard they switched up towers 12 and 22"?
Does that mean the towers per se, meaning helicopters to put #12 where #22 is and visa versa? Yikes!
Or, does that mean they are switching the sheeve trains from #12 to #22 and visa versa?
Regardless, any idea how long it will take to address the problem?
Thanks for all your insights.
CCCSKI
k2trav wrote:Heard they switched up towers 12 and 22
gondicar wrote:I heard that they positioned everything so Taylor and Travis could be there after the football season was over.
Alpiner wrote:I think someone would have noticed if they switched whole towers as that would require a helicopter.
Alpiner wrote:I think someone would have noticed if they switched whole towers as that would require a helicopter. Probably just the shieve trains if anything. Hope Doppelmeyer is giving Sugarloaf a coupon for free hot chocolate for all this.
Anyway, it doesn't matter that the lift didn't open on Friday, as conditions were absolute dogshit last weekend through yesterday. It will matter for school vacation week. SQ line needs some relief.
I wonder....
- Will BE reduce lines at SQ enough to forego replacement with a 6?
- Will BE really run 7 days a week?
- Does Sugarloaf really have staff to run BE and groom and make snow in that area without sacrificing some of the rest of the mountain?
- Will the Bucksaw area get groomed 1st/2nd/3rd shift? Hopefully 1st. 3rd shift groomers (Haulback, etc) don't have time to "set up" and get good.
- Will it ever snow again this winter?
High Ball wrote:Alpiner wrote:I think someone would have noticed if they switched whole towers as that would require a helicopter. Probably just the shieve trains if anything. Hope Doppelmeyer is giving Sugarloaf a coupon for free hot chocolate for all this.
Anyway, it doesn't matter that the lift didn't open on Friday, as conditions were absolute dogshit last weekend through yesterday. It will matter for school vacation week. SQ line needs some relief.
I wonder....
- Will BE reduce lines at SQ enough to forego replacement with a 6?
- Will BE really run 7 days a week?
- Does Sugarloaf really have staff to run BE and groom and make snow in that area without sacrificing some of the rest of the mountain?
- Will the Bucksaw area get groomed 1st/2nd/3rd shift? Hopefully 1st. 3rd shift groomers (Haulback, etc) don't have time to "set up" and get good.
- Will it ever snow again this winter?
All good questions, especially the 2nd one. Wonder what they’re telling the people that are spending a million plus for a house lot. Karl has been on record several times that they intend to run WM and BE every day.
High Ball wrote: All good questions, especially the 2nd one. Wonder what they’re telling the people that are spending a million plus for a house lot. Karl has been on record several times that they intend to run WM and BE every day.
Rossignolsoul7 wrote:High Ball wrote: All good questions, especially the 2nd one. Wonder what they’re telling the people that are spending a million plus for a house lot. Karl has been on record several times that they intend to run WM and BE every day.
I'd be shocked if BE doesn't run everyday. They'll sacrifice another lift (TL or KP) for this one if staff is short.
For WM, there's absolutely no reason to run this 7 day/week. This new shortened lift will be useful for about 5 houses (at most) on the lower part of Penobscot Circle and the Timberline condos. Anyone above that will prefer to ski down to the new WM X-cut directly to BE. During the week, there's hardly anyone in the Timberline condos so there's no way this will run 7day/week.
For anyone building in Dutchman Woods, the WM lift is totally obsolete, they'll ski directly to BE.
SpillwayEast wrote:Anyone surprised Bucksaw is on wind hold today?
gondicar wrote:SpillwayEast wrote:Anyone surprised Bucksaw is on wind hold today?
Not at all based on the forecast, ie screaming winds out of the south/southeast, but I’m not there so I don’t know if that is actually what is happening.
SpillwayEast wrote:gondicar wrote:SpillwayEast wrote:Anyone surprised Bucksaw is on wind hold today?
Not at all based on the forecast, ie screaming winds out of the south/southeast, but I’m not there so I don’t know if that is actually what is happening.
King Pine and Skyline are running but not Bucksaw
SpillwayEast wrote:gondicar wrote:SpillwayEast wrote:Anyone surprised Bucksaw is on wind hold today?
Not at all based on the forecast, ie screaming winds out of the south/southeast, but I’m not there so I don’t know if that is actually what is happening.
King Pine and Skyline are running but not Bucksaw
Pow on the Mao wrote:parking lot G is fucking glorious. we average 6 runs on Tuesday mornings and got 8 today by eliminating the walk from C to SQ ad reverse.
my new reggae spot.
Another important part of our work is a commitment to observe and listen, and to communicate transparently with our guests.
JAC487 wrote:And yet radio silence on the "mechanical issue" that plagued King Pine. Transparency isn't setting you up for bad PR but keeping the public uninformed is bad marketing. https://www.sugarloaf.com/lifts still brings you to a page that is no longer easy to find on the website. This except from the page has not aged wellAnother important part of our work is a commitment to observe and listen, and to communicate transparently with our guests.
Oh and did anyone else hear about the avalanches (yes plural) on Sunday? If so, it definitely wasn't via an official channel.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 35 guests